data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b537f/b537fe022ee417686499373a0c9459470aedcaf9" alt="Space empires iv races"
Marginally more engaging is the tactical option. Go with the strategic option and you get to watch coloured dots the size of gnat testicles dancing around on a scanner screen for a few minutes. When two opposing craft or fleets end-up in the same hex the action shifts to either a tactical or a strategic combat resolution screen (your choice). By concentrating your tubs into flotillas and assigning them roles and behaviours within those formations, you're far less likely to get bushwhacked by every wandering Tom, Dick, and Xyyh'ari. Running a large complex empire and operating hundreds maybe thousands of different ships at the same time is made much easier by the presence of silicon ministers - AI entities that can take over the running of vessels or colonies - and a sophisticated fleet system. There's a similar laboriousness to some other management tasks like rearranging production queues, but overall the interface is more aid than obstruction. Though upgrading involves just a few button presses per blueprint, the process can get pretty tiresome after a while. To take full advantage of these inventions it's necessary to amend ship designs after each discovery. Sculpting, testing, tweaking, and naming this exotic shoal is probably the most interesting aspect of the game.Īt times you'll be developing new weapons, armour, engine or sensor techs every turn. With hundreds of different components, and dozens of different chassis available by the later stages of a game, your systems can end-up swarming with a startling range of marques and models. Every planet-smiting super-dreadnought, every humble minesweeper, expendable fighter and bog-standard sputnik is based on a grid-based design drawn-up personally by the player. Unlike most strategy fare, SE5 puts a big emphasis on bespoke units. Thankfully enlarging your deep-space dominion isn't just a process of churning out starships and sending them further and further afield. I'm planning a Diplomat variant of the Europa with squash courts and massage parlours instead of plague missiles and napalm.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77f5a/77f5ac960c3c2ede76e6a1c215d7ee454e57766b" alt="space empires iv races space empires iv races"
Without a story or optional side missions, every game boils down to roughly the same thing - a relentless rush to expand and consolidate, expand and consolidate, expand and consolidate. While this offers endless replayability through its numerous configuration options, it provides none of the short-term incentives or careful pacing you'll find in scenario-based campaigns. All Malfador's efforts have gone into a giant freeform campaign mode. In fact, it's without missions of any kind. The logical way to have introduced topics like these would have been through a gentle introductory mission sequence. It's only when you're a few hours into that first marathon that you realise that you know nothing about crucial game aspects like tactical combat, trade, satellites, mines, and drones, and have to go rummaging around in the manual and in-game encyclopaedia. Digest the text contained in fifty short tutorial messages (a painless 20 minute task) and you're ready to embark on your first domination bid. For a game that's up there with the likes of Paradox's Europa Universalis and Hearts of Iron series in terms of breadth and depth, SE5 is remarkably easy to get to grips with. It sounds straightforward enough and, initially at least, it is. Shouldn't the planets move round those big glowy things?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4d1c/d4d1c7d464866420235da3a2bc22f74f4bed7574" alt="space empires iv races space empires iv races"
The more planets you can occupy, the more resources you'll have at your disposal and the more room you'll have to build the facilities that gather and store those resources, and construct and service your conquest fleet.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/72593/72593db91cf289b053793c4e0b2fc1d6a68fbe19" alt="space empires iv races space empires iv races"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d5773/d5773ef7360010b5caa6972696a20d1e7a064a22" alt="space empires iv races space empires iv races"
You're a race - one of a possible 14 - that's out to colonise a vast, randomly generated galaxy of interconnected star systems. The basic premise is turn-based intergalactic imperialism. SE5 tries to do a hell of a lot on a titchy development budget, and unsurprisingly winds-up weak in several departments (the most obvious weakness should be evident from the screenshots). 'Ambitious', as every seasoned review reader knows, is almost always a euphemism for 'over-ambitious'. If, on the other hand, you're looking for the sort of review that compares an ambitious space colonisation strategy game to a dead badger and mentions gnat testicles and solid gold hats then you're in luck. If you're looking for the sort of review that compares Space Empires V to Space Empires IV then the following is going to disappoint (This is my first foray into the series).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b537f/b537fe022ee417686499373a0c9459470aedcaf9" alt="Space empires iv races"